Suggestion on FOR/NEXT syntax

[Ionic Wind Support Team]

OK enough.  It is sufficient to make a suggestion once.

The parser design requires the variable in the NEXT statment to maintain context and for error checking.  To remove the variable requires a redesign of the FOR statement on my part, and my time is better spent elsewhere at the moment.  It is not just a simple matter of removing somenthing, it requires the implimentation of a separate context stack like we did in Aurora.  And it is not something that is broken but has been in use in various languages for 25 years.

Paul.

[erosolmi]

As supposed, I was 100% right.
It is something I've already faced and it was not a trivial task.

[paravantis]

Paul,

To remove the variable requires a redesign of the FOR statement on my part, and my time is better spent elsewhere at the moment.  It is not just a simple matter of removing something, it requires the implementation of a separate context stack like we did in Aurora.

Point understood.

If you had made this clarification right off the bat, I would not have appeared to be making the same suggestion twice.

[J B Wood (Zumwalt)]

.... glad this is straightened out ...